Saturday, 28 December 2013

Introduction

We've met this individual before somewhere, and he's running a very slick operation on the tube. We even had to commend him for his slickness, because it is very professional - when you are out to swindle, it simply has to be, there is no other choice. As most people's attention spans have dwindled to literally minutes and seeking knowledge for them has become reduced to watching byte-sized vids on the tube (because reading and studying books is so excruciatingly painful and boring), the situation is ripe for individuals such as this one to come along and play the pied-piper. Citing isolated, decontextualized statements of the Scholars or brandishing their phraseology whilst concealing the reality of what these scholars meant by it is the method by which this individual and countless others deceive and misguide the people away from the Prophetic Sunnah and instead to the misguided innovations they have entered into the religion. He is holding up the book of Imaam al-Nawawi, (تهذيب الأسماء واللغات) and is impressing upon the byte-sized deen-learner how Imam al-Nawawi, allegedly, is sanctioning the innovations (in worship) that he and his likes spread amongst the Ummah. The reality is not as simple as he makes it out to be and is in fact otherwise, and we will address this matter, by Allaah's permission in this article.

To appreciate this article fully, please be sure to read and digest Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, and Part 6. Also useful for you to read is the definition of bid'ah, and its basis from the Sunnah and understanding that it is of two types (haqiqiyyah and idafiyyah) from the angle of how it relates to Shariah evidences (see this article, and this one). It is also crucial for you to study and understand this diagram in conjunction with the other parts of this series which have preceded.

Revision of the Basics
So far we have established that whenever the term "praiseworthy innovation" (البدعة المحمودة) and "good innovation" (البدعة الحسنة) is used in the language of certain scholars, they are using it purely in its linguistic sense (not Shariah sense). This we established from Ibn Hajar (see here) and also Ibn Rajab (see quote in this article). Further, we established that by inspecting and examining the actual examples given by those who categorize innovation (البدعة) into obligatory (الواجب), recommended (المندوب) and permissible (المباح), it is very clear that they are in fact speaking of either a) something that is not an innovation in the Shariah sense at all (e.g. tarawih prayer in congregation in Ramadan in the mosque) or b) something that comes under the topic of al-maslahah al-mursalah, a matter of broad public interest by which specified Shariah goals are served and by which the five necessities (religion, life, intellect, wealth and lineage) are preserved (see this article for understanding and this article for illustrative examples given by al-Izz bin Abd al-Salam to show what he actually intended). This is where schools, hospices, teaching Arabic grammar and so on enter into as explained by the Scholars who speak of innovation (bidah) having classifications. If you have got all of that in the bag, then grab your stick, join us, and lets collectively give this doubt (of the Innovators) a pounding and send it back from where it came ...
Understanding the Deceptive Tactics Of These Innovators
In order to understand how these people are operating we need to know that those scholars whose words they are employing (al-Nawawi, al-Izz bin Abd al-Salam, Ibn Hajar etc.) have two types of statements:

The first type: A mere mention of bidah being either "praiseworthy innovation" (البدعة المحمودة) or "blameworthy innovation" (البدعة المذمومة) or bidah being of categories such as obligatory (الواجب), recommended (المندوب) and permissible (المباح) but without any further elaboration and giving of illustrative examples, because within the context in which they are writing, they are only intending to make a quick hint or reference to the matter.
The second type: A mention of those phrases and terms but this time with full elaboration and illustrative examples which reveal their intent and which show exactly what their objective is in using these terms and classifications.

Examples of each of these types will be clear as we progress in this article, but the trick and deception of the Innovators is that they will gather together as many statements as they can from the first type, or selectively quote parts from the second type, and then present them to the people and subsequently make very general statements like, (هذا ما عليه كبار العلماء وهذا ما نحن عليه), "This is what the Major Scholars are upon and this is what we are upon." So your byte-sized deen learner only gets a surface-level, shallow understanding and has only learned terms and phrases yet is none the wiser about what these Scholars really intend by the use of these terms and classifications. All he knows is that the scholars used these terms and made these classifications, but any mention of them has been stripped of the explanation, meaning and illustrative exemplification. And even those quotes which may have added elaboration have been decontextualized by removal of the appropriate information which provides all the details as to what is really intended. The swindler is therefore able to lead the intended target audience into thinking that innovating into the matters of worship to bring oneself closer to Allaah is perfectly legitimate and sanctioned by these scholars, and that this is, allegedly, "what the Major scholars are upon." So the fraud is complete, having been executed to perfection with the slick presentation, and the deceiver is free to move on to the next swindle.
Practical Illustration of the Academic Fraud
The deceptive individual pictured earlier has posted a few videos and in each of them he has cited a quote from al-Nawawi from the same place in one of his books (تهذيب الأسماء واللغات). Al-Nawawi is discussing the entry (بدع) and he does actually elaborate upon it in detail, but this crooked Habashite Sufi pictured above eliminated the part where al-Nawawi explains the intent behind the classification (through a full citation from al-Izz bin Abd al-Salam). Each quote that we bring below is the subject of a separate video created by these people. Their intent is to isolate each of the general statements that offer no detail or explanation as to the intent and purpose behind the classification of these scholars so that the intended audience thinks "how numerous are these statements that legitimize innovation" when they see all these individual videos. So lets now analyze those isolated statements that are used as part of the bait.
1st Statement of Imam al-Nawawi from Tahdhib al-Asmaa wal-Lughaat
The first quote from al-Nawawi is from his book (تهذيب الأسماء واللغات), Idarah al-Tibaa'ah al-Muniriyyah, (3/22), and this is presented in its own short video on the tube:

البدعة بكسر الباء في الشرع هي إحداث ما لم يكن في عهد رسول الله وهي منقسمة إلى حسنة وقبيحة

Al-Bidah, with a kasrah on the letter baa, in the Shariah it is the introduction (invention) of that which is not found in the era of the Messenger of Allaah, and it is divided into [that which is] good and [that which is] repugnant.

So this quote is isolated like this and presented and a person thinks, "Hey, yes they are right, there is "good bidah" in the religion," but little does the person know what exactly al-Nawawi (and others) intend by this phrase - that part is kept hidden.
2nd Statement of Imam al-Nawawi from Tahdhib al-Asmaa wal-Lughaat
In another separate video, from the same location as above, this next passage is quoted from al-Nawawi:

قال الشيخ الإمام المجمع على إمامته وجلالته وتمكنه في أنواع العلوم وبراعته أبو محمد عبد العزيز بن عبد السلام رحمه الله ورضي عنه في آخر كتاب القواعد : البدعة منقسمة إلى واجبة ومحرمة ومندوبة ومكروهة ومباحة، والطريق في ذلك أن تعرض البدعة على قواعد الشريعة فإن دخلت في قواعد الإيجاب فهي واجبة أو في قواعد التحريم فمحرمة أو الندب فمندوبة أو في المكروه فمكروهة أو المباح فمباحة

The Shaykh, the Imaam whose leadership, lofty stature, and proficiency and skill in a variety of sciences is agreed upon, Abu Muhammad Abd al-Aziz bin Abd al-Asalam (rahimahullaah wa radiya anhu) said, at the end of his book, al-Qawa'id:
Innovation is divided into obligatory (waajibah), unlawful (muharramah), recommended (makruhah), disliked (makruhah) and permitted (mubaahah), and the way to knowing that is to view the innovation in light of the Shariah principles, and so if it enters into the principles of obligation, then it is obligatory, or [if it enters into] the principles of unlawfulness, then it is unlawful, or if recommended, then recommended, or if [its falls into] the disliked, then disliked, or the permitted, then permitted.

This is the well known statement of al-Izz bin Abd al-Salaam which has been quoted from him by other authorities such as Ibn Hajar in al-Fath, and al-Shatibi also quotes it (and proceeds to refute it and show that it is itself an innovation having no proof).
3rd Statement of Imam al-Nawawi from Tahdhib al-Asmaa wal-Lughaat
Then in a separate video another section of this passage from al-Nawawi is isolated and presented, and this time it is al-Nawawi's citation of the statement of al-Shafi'i through al-Bayhaqi:

وروى البيهقي بإسناده في مناقب الشافعي عن الشافعي رضي الله عنه قال : المحدثات من الأمور ضربان، أحدهما ما أُحدث مما يخالف كتابا أو سنة أو أثرا أو اجماعا فهذه البدعة الضلالة، والثانية ما أحدث من الخير لا خلاف فيه لواحد من العلماء وهذه محدثة غير مذمومة، وقد قال عمر رضي الله عنة في قيام شهر رمضان: نعمتُ البدعة هذه، يعني أنها محدثة لم تكن

Al-Bayhaqi reports with his chain in Manaqib al-Shafi'i from al-Shafi'i (radiallaahu anhu) that he said:
Newly-invented matters are of two types: The first of them is what opposes [something from] the Book, or [something from] the Sunnah, or a narration [from the Companions], or [a matter of] consensus, this is the misguided innovation. And the second is what has been introduced of goodness and there is not a single scholar who opposes it. This is newly-introduced yet not blameworthy and Umar (radiallaahu anhu) had said about the qiyam (al-layl) in the month of Ramadan, "What an excellent innovation this is," meaning, that it is newly-introduced and was not previously done.

We have already addressed this quote in the article on the statements of al-Shafi'i (see here) so please refer to that. However, it is clear that al-Shafi'i's words are in relation to bidah from a purely linguistic meaning and this is very clear from what he says at the very end when he quotes the saying of Umar and then says, (يعني أنها محدثة لم تكن), "meaning, that it is newly-introduced and was not previously done..." and al-Shafi'i knows that this was in fact done by the Messenger (alayhis salam) but abandoned because he (alayhis salaam) feared it might become wajib (obligatory) upon his Ummah. So this act of worship has specific proof in the Sunnah, but its re-enactment is referred to by al-Shafi'i as "bidah" purely from a linguistic meaning and not a Shariah meaning, and this act does not have opposition to the Shariah, rather it is in perfect agreement with the Shariah, with the Prophetic Sunnah, in its foundations and details. Hence, it is not an innovation in the blameworthy sense.
All the above three quotes were all from the same section. But what was left out? Well lets go and take a look!
What Has Been Deliberately Omitted!
That's right, the most crucial part of it all, which actually explains the classifications that these Shafi'ite jurists were making use of, even thought it is right there, sandwiched between all those quotes you have read above, it is not presented and mostly kept from view. The reason is plainly obvious, because the game would be over and the fraud would be plain to see. We have already alluded to this elaboration by al-Izz bin Abd al-Salam in the articles dedicate to his statements (see Part 4 and opening of Part 5). Here is the full entry:

Tuesday, 22 October 2013

ደራሲ ነኝ ካሰብክ
መልካም ጆሮ ፣ሰፊ ልብ ፣ደከመኝ የማይል የማወቅ ጉጉት ፣ዉል ያለው ስነ ምግባር ፣ከፍ ያለ የ ማስታወስ ችሎታ፣ሰፊና ልዩ የማንበብ ልምድ ፣ያለ አካላዊና አአምሮዓዊ ብርታት ፣መጠናኝ አኔነት ፣ከሰዎች ጋር ትውውቅ ማብዛት ፣ቦታንና ጊዜ ን በውል የማወቅ ባህሪ ሊኖርህ ይገባል ።
(ጀምስ ሆልምስ )

EthioAnonymous (Join our Community on g+)
owner

- Yesterday 5:55 PM

“እንጠራጠረዋለን” አሉ
"በአዲስ አበባው ፍንዳታ የሞቱት ኢትዮጵያዊያን ናቸው"

በአዲስ አበባ ቦሌ ክፍለ ከተማ ሩዋንዳ ሰፈር የደረሰውን ፍንዳታ አስመልክቶ ኢህአዴግ ያሰራጨውን ዜና የሚቃረኑ መረጃዎችና አስተያየቶች ቀረቡ። ለኢህአዴግ ቅርበት ያላቸው የፖለቲካ ፓርቲዎች የድጋፍ አስተያየት ሲሰጡ ዶ/ር መረራ “አትፍቶ ጠፊ አጥፍቶ ይጠፋል እንጂ በሜዳ ዝም ብሎ አያጠፋም” ሲሉ ጥርጣሬ እንዳላቸው ተናግረዋል። የትግራይ ህዝብ ዴሞክራሲያዊ ንቅናቄ /ትህዴን/ በፍንዳታው የሞቱት ኢትዮጵያውያን ናቸው ሲል ስም ገልጾ የኢህአዴግን ዜና አጠጥሎታል።

በፓርላማ አስቸኳይ ስብሰባ እንዲጠራ የጠየቁት ከኢህአዴግ ጋር ግንኙነት እንዳላቸው የሚታሙ ፓርቲዎች “የጸረ ሽብርተኞች አዋጅ ሊጠናከርና ሊጠብቅ ይገባል” ሲሉ ተደምጠዋል። የኢትዮጵያ ቴሌቪዥን ያነጋገራቸው የኢራፓ፣ የኢሴዳፓ፣ ቅንጅትና አዲአን ተወካዮች በየተራ የኢህአዴግን ዜና የሚቃወሙና በጥርጣሬ የሚመለከቱትን አውግዘዋል። በወቅቱ የቴሌቪዥን ጣቢያውም አንድነትና የሰማያዊ ፓርቲ ጠርተውት በነበረው ሰላማዊ የተቃውሞ ሰልፍ ላይ “የጸረ ሽብርተኛነት አዋጅ ለሌላ ተግባር መዋሉን እንቃወማለን” በማለት የተቃውሞ ድምጻቸውን ሲያሰሙ በማሳየት ዜናውን ለማጀቢያነት ተጠቅሞበት ነበር።

በግል አስተያየታቸውን የተጠየቁት ዶ/ር መረራ ጉዲና በቴሌቪዥን መስኮት ቀርበው “ብዙዎች፣ እኔም ጓደኞቼም በጥርጣሬ ነው ያየነው” ሲሉ ከተቆረጠው ንግግራቸው ተደምጧል። ዶ/ር መረራ “አጥፍቶ ጠፊ አጥፍቶ ይጠፋል እንጂ በሜዳ ዝም ብሎ ራሱን አያጠፋም” ካሉ በኋላ “ስለዚህ እውነት ተደርጓል?” የሚለው ትልቁ ችግርና የጥርጣሬው መነሻ እንደሆነ አመልክተዋል።

ስለዚህ በሚል ድምዳሜ “ሰው አንዳንድ ጊዜ የኢትዮጵያ መንግስት ለራሱ ፖለቲካ ብሎ የሚያደርገው ያው የለመደው ስራ ነው” እንደሚል ዶ/ር መረራ በተቀነጨበው አስተያየታቸው ሲናገሩ ተሰምቷል። በተቃራኒ ከላይ በስም የተዘረዘሩት የፖለቲካ ፓርቲ አመራሮች፣ ኢትዮጵያ የሽብር ጥቃት ኢላማና የአልሸባብ ስጋት ላይ ያለች አገር በመሆኗ ኢህአዴግ ህዝብን የመጠበቅና ደህንነትን የማስጠበቅ አደራ ስላለበት እነሱን ጨምሮ እንዲጠብቃቸው ጥሪ አቅርበዋል።

ከቅርብ ጊዜ ወዲህ ስሙ የሚነሳውና በታጣቂ ሃይሉ ፈርጣማነት የሚታወቀው የትግራይ ህዝብ ዴሞክራሲያዊ ንቅናቄ /ትህዴን/ በቦሌ ክፍለ ከተማ በቤት ውስጥ ፈነዳ በተባለው ፈንጂ ህይወታቸው እንዳለፈ የተገለጸው ሁለት የሶማሌ ዜጎች አይደሉም ሲል ከሁሉም ወገን የተሰራጨውን ዜና በዜሮ አጣፍቶታ። በፈንጂው የሞቱት ሁለት ሰዎች ኢትዮጵያዊያን መሆናቸውን ስማቸውም “ምክትል ኢንስፔክተር ሞላ መላኩ የተባሉ የፖሊስ አባልና አቶ ሞገስ አስቻለው የተባሉ ሲቪል ናቸው” ሲል የገለጸው ትህዴን የሟቾቹ ስም በመታወቂያ መረጋገጡን አመልክቷል።የመታወቂያውን ቅጂ ግን በገጹ አላተመም። ከአደጋው ጋር በተያያዘ በስፍራው ታይታችኋል በሚል በርካታ የተቃዋሚ ፓርቲ አባላት መታሰራቸውን በመግለጽ የሶስት እስረኞችን ስም ይፋ ያደረገው ኦክቶበር 19 ቀን 2013 በራሱ ኦፊሳላዊ ድረገጽ ላይ ነው። ኢህአዴግም ቢሆን ሞቱ የተባሉትን ሰዎች ይህ ዜና እስከተጻፈበት ቀን ድረስ በሰነድ አስደግፎ አላቀረባቸውም።

በሌላ በኩል ኦክቶበር16 ለንባብ የበቃው ሪፖርተር ጋዜጣ ጥቅምት 3ቀን 2006ዓ.ም. በቦሌ ክፍለ ከተማ ሩዋንዳ ማዞሪያና ቦሌ ሚካኤል መግቢያ አካባቢ በቦምብ ፍንዳታ ሕይወታቸው ያለፈው ሁለት ሶማሊያውያን ሽብርተኞች መሆናቸውን ማረጋገጡን፣ የፌዴራል ፖሊስ የፀረ ሽብር ግብረ ኃይል ማስታወቁን ዘግቧል።

የአንድ ግለሰብ ሰርቪስ ቤት ተከራይተው ከነበሩት ሶማሊያውያኑ መካከል፣ አንደኛው ከ20ቀናት በላይ የቆየ ሲሆን፣ ሌላኛው ፍንዳታው ከመድረሱ ከሁለት ሰዓታት በፊት የደረሰ መሆኑን ግብረ ኃይሉ ማረጋገጡን ያመለከተው ሪፖርተር ሽብርተኛ የተባሉት ሶማሊያውያኑ ካፈነዱት ቦምብ በተጨማሪ መጠናቸው ያልተገለጸ ቦምቦችና አንድ ሽጉጥ ከሁለት ካርታ ጥይት ጋር መገኘቱን፣ የፈንጂ ማቀጣጠያና የአደጋ መከላከያ ጃኬቶች፣ የኢትዮጵያ ብሔራዊ ቡድን ማሊያና ቀበቶዎች መገኘታቸውም ጠቁሟል፡፡ ከሶማሊያውያኑ ጋር ቀጥታ ግንኙነት አላቸው የተባሉ ሦስት ተጠርጣሪዎችና የቤቱ አከራይ በቁጥጥር ሥር ውለው ምርመራ እየተካሄባቸው መሆኑንም ግብረ ኃይሉ አክሏል በማለት ሪፖርተር ዘግቧል። አዲስ አድማስ በበኩሉ አልሸባብ ለጥቃቱ ሃላፊነት መውሰዱን አድራሻው አልተመዘገበ የትዊተር ማረጋገጫ በማመላከት ከዚህ በታች ያለውን ዜና አስነብቧል። ይቀጥላል ...

አንዴት ናቹ ጉዋደኞቼ ?አኔ ደህና ነኝ። አናንተም ደህና ሁኑልኝ።።ታድያ አንዳንጠፋፋ በሉ ቻው ቻው

Monday, 17 June 2013

“አህባሽ” ሆይ! የሱስንዮስና የአጼ ዮሀንስ ዘመን አልፏል!

22 Sep

የኢትዮጵያ ታሪክ በጦርነትና በፍትጊያ የተሞላ ነው፡፡ ከነዚህ ጦርነቶች መካከል አብዛኛዎቹ በእብሪተኛ መሪዎች ቀስቃሽነት ነበር የተካሄዱት፡፡ ዓለም በስልጣኔና ጎዳና ወደ ፊት ሲገሰግስ የያኔዎቹ የኢትዮጵያ መሪዎች ግን “እኔ አውቅልሀለሁ” በሚል ጀብደኝነታቸው ህዝቡን እርስ በራሱ ያጫርሱት ነበር፡፡ አንዳንድ መሪዎችማ ህዝቡ የቀድሞ እምነቱን ትቶ እነርሱ የመረጡለትን ጎዳና እንዲከተል ለማስገደድ ሲሉ ህዝቡን ከፍተኛ እልቂት ባስከተሉ ጦርነቶች ውስጥ ሲዘፍቁት ኖረዋል፡፡ ነገር ግን እነርሱ የፈለጉት ሃይማኖትን የማስቀየር ፖሊሲ አልተሳካላቸውም፡፡ ይህንንም በሁለት ምሳሌዎች መግለጽ ይቻላል፡፡
1. አጼ ሱስንዮስ (ከ1605-1632)፡- አጼ ሱስንዮስ ከምዕራብ አውሮፓ (ፖርቱጋልና እስፔን) በመጡት የካቶሊክ እምነት ሰባኪያን ተማርኮ ሃይማኖቱን ለወጠ፡፡ ሳይውል ሳያድርም በሀገሪቱ ውስጥ ያሉት ካህናት፤ ቀሳውስትና መላው የክርስቲያን ህዝብ የኦርቶዶክስ ሃይማኖቱን ትቶ ወደ ካቶሊክ እምነት እንዲገባ አዋጅ አስነገረ፡፡ ህዝቡ ግን ትዕዛዙን “አልቀበልም!” አለ፡፡ በነገሩ የተናደደው አጼም ፍላጎቱን በሃይል ለመፈጸም ተነሳ፡፡ መላው ሰራዊቱን በክርስቲያኑ ህዝብ ላይ አዘመተ፡፡ ህዝቡም ከሱስንዮስ ሰራዊት ጋር ተጋፈጠ፡፡ በሀገሪቱ ላይ የጦርነት እሳት ነደደ፡፡ አጼ ሱስንዮስ ጀብደኝት ባሳወረው ወኔው በጦርነቱ ገፋበት፡፡ ለ27 አመታት በዘለቀው የስልጣን ዘመኑ ምንም ሳይሰራበት ሀገሪቷን በጦርነት እሳት ሲለበልባት ቆየ፡፡ እርሱ የለኮሰው እሳት የቆመው አጼው “አለም በቃኝ” ብሎ ወደ ገዳም ሲገባና ልጁ ፋሲል በአባቱ ቦታ ንጉስ ተብሎ ሲሾም ነው፡፡
(ይህ ምሳሌ የሚመለከተው ክርስቲያኖችን ነው፡፡ ቢሆንም ክርስቲያን ወገኖቻችን አሁን እኛን የገጠመን ፈተና በሱስንዮስ ዘመን ያጋጠማቸውን ፈተና ያህል ከባድ እንደሆነ እንዲረዱልን ስለምፈልግ በምሳሌነት ጠቅሼዋለሁ)፡፡
2. አጼ ዮሀንስ አራተኛ (ከ1870-1888)፡ አጼ ዮሀንስ “በአንድ ሀገር አንድ ሃይማኖት” በሚለው ፖሊሲያቸው ይታወቃሉ፡፡ ይህንን ፖሊሲ በስራ ላይ ለማዋል ሲሉ ከታናሻቸው ከምኒልክ ጋር እንኳ ተጣልተዋል (ምኒልክ ጥሩ ባይባሉም በሃይማኖት ፖሊሲያቸው ከዮሀንስ ይሻላሉ)፡፡
አጼ ዮሀንስ ፖሊሲያቸውን ለመተግበር ሲነሱ በቅድሚያ የመረጡት የወሎ ክፍለ ሀገርን ነው፡፡ በዚሁ መሰረትም ለብዙ ምዕተ አመታት እምነታቸውን አስጠብቀው የቆዩት የወሎ ሙስሊሞች በአንድ ወር ውስጥ ክርስትና ካልተነሱ በሰይፍ እንደሚቀጡ አዋጅ ተነገረ፡፡
ወላዋዩና ሹመት ፈላጊው (እንደ ራስ ሚካኤል አይነቱ) የአጼውን ትእዛዝ ለመፈጸም ተሸቀዳደመ፡፡ አብዛኛው ህዝብ ግን እስልምናን በምንም ዋጋ እንደማይለውጥ ለአጼው ቁርጡን ነገራቸው፡፡ በነገሩ የተናደዱት አጼ ዮሀንስ የሽብርና የጦርነት ጅራፋቸውን በወሎ ህዝብ ላይ መዘዙ፡፡ ሙስሊሙ ህዝብ በሼኽ ጠለሃ ጃዕፈር፤ በአብደላ ጪፍራ፤ በአባ ዋጠው እና በሌሎችም ሙጃሂዶች ዙሪያ በመሰለፍ እብሪተኛውን አጼ ተጋፈጠ፡፡ የአጼው ጥቃት እየባሰበት ሲሄድም ሙስሊሙ ህዝብ ለሃይማኖቱ ሲል ወደ ሀረር፤ ባሌ፤ ጅማ እና ጉራጌ ተሰደደ፡፡ ነገሩ አንጀቱን ያሳረረው ደግሞ ወደ ሱዳን እተሰደደ ከኢማም አህመድ አልማህዲ ጦር ጋር ተቀላቀለ፡፡ አጼው በጦርነት ፖሊሲያቸው ገፉበት፡፡ ሆኖም ጦርነቱ ሃይማኖትን ሊያስለውጥ አልቻልም፡፡ እንዲያውም የርሳቸው ህይወት እንዲቀጠፍ ምክንያት ሆነ፡፡
ከላይ የጠቀስናቸው ሁለት ምሳሌዎች በርካታ ቁምነገሮችን ያስተምሩናል፡፡ በኢትዮጵያ ውስጥ እምነትን በግድ ለመጫን የሚደረግ ጥረት መጨረሻው ውድቀት እንደሆነ ተቀባይ አዕምሮ በደንብ ይገነዘባል፡፡ ዛሬ አለም በሰለጠነበትና ጭፍንነትና አጉል አክራሪነት አንድ እርምጃ እንኳበማያራምዱበት ዘመን አህባሾች “አይናችሁን ጨፍኑ ላሞኛችሁ” ሊሉን መጥተዋል፡፡ ከኋላቸው በሚገፋቸው ስውር እጅ (አሜሪካ) እየታገዙ የመጅሊስን ስልጣን በመቆጣጠራቸው ብቻ ድል የሚቀናቸው እየመሰላቸው ነው፡፡ ህዝቡ ግን “እስከዛሬ የተከለተላችሁት እምነት ስህተት ስለሆነ በአዲስ መልክ ወደ እስልምና ግቡ” ሊሉት የመጡ መሆናቸውን በደንብ ያውቃል፡፡ የዓለም ህዝብ የሚያምንባቸውንና ለሃይማኖታቸው ከልባቸው ሲሰሩ የቆዩትን ኡለማ “ካፊር ናቸው” እያሉ በመሳደባቸው ብቻ ልቡ ቆስሏል፡፡
ስለዚህ አህባሾች የመጅሊስን ስልጣን ቀርቶ የሀገሪቱን ስልጣን ሙሉ በሙሉ ቢቆጣጠሩ እንኳ የሚለውጡት አማኝ ያለ አይመስለኝም፡፡ ይህ ህዝብ አያቶቹ ከነ አጼ ዮሐንስ ጋር እየተጋፈጡ የጠበቁትን እስልምና በተራ ጮሌነት ያስረክባል ብለው ገምተው ከሆነ በህልም አለም ውስጥ ነው ያሉትና ህዝቡ ራሱ “ከህልማችሁ ንቁ!”ይላቸዋል፡፡ እውነታው ደግሞ በተግባር ይታያል፡፡
ድል የኢስላም ነው!! አላሁ አክበር!!

ahbash....Who is their Enemy? The “Wahhabiyya” or Islam itself?

20 Sep

Tracing to the background of its foundation and the inner interest of the group, I wondered why the “Ahbash” jama’a blaspheme and curse Sayyid Qutb, Rashid Rida, Jamaluudin Al-Afghani and their followers. I say this because in the teachings of these Islamic revivalists, you can’t see a direct clash with the tenets of Ahbashi’s interests (remember that Ahbash’s main interest is to protect their own version of Islam which is highly mixed with polytheism/shirk and superstition). They don’t emphasize “Aqidah” or what nullifies one’s Aqidah. In their writings, they also don’t mention about “grave worshiping” to which the “Ahbash” are highly symphatic. It’s really confusing to know the reason. But as you study the Ahbashi’s inclination to the secularists and especially to the western governments, you would know the reason. I state it according to a minor study of mine.
For long years, the westerns were searching a group which marches against “Militant Islamism” (in the western words) from within Islam itself. They found that “Ahbash” is against the formation of Islamic state (in any form, be in a Caliphate form or an Islamic Republic). Further, they learned that “Ahbash” doesn’t allow Muslims to participate in politics and form a political party. They assed the case from different angles and they are satisfied when they realized the “Ahbash” objective is to form moderate Muslims who hold Islam to the minimum. That is, for Ahbash, it’s enough to say “great achievement” if they create a Muslim who hold his religion only for ceremonial purposes- for example a Muslims who goes to the mosque only on Jum’a/Friday and in Ramadan (you may understand this from Ahbash’s “Murji’a” behavior where they say “anyone who witness “Shahada” only once in his life time will go to “Jannah” even if he doesn’t do any good thing).
The westerns, as heard its emergence and approached it in Beirut in 1980- early 1990s, were very delighted by the stand of Ahbash. But it was hard for them to split it from Syria (Ahbash’s patron state at the time). Latter, as the Hezbollah was growing higher, Syria started to neglect Ahbash and turn its face to Hezbollah. So the poor Ahbash lost its ground and rush to take refuge to the west. It was accepted warmly and equipped with what it needed (I think the staff of the American University of Beirut served to form this West-Ahbash negotiations). The Ahbash then, to make the westerns please more, starts blaspheming past scholars whom it thought “the architects of militant Islamism”. The story goes then, and with the September 11/2001 attacks, Ahbash got the greatest chance where it would have to win a big trophy from the west for being “the true Muslims who can live with west in the future world”. This was the clue as to why Sayyid Qutb and other revivalists became the chief enemies of Ahbash jama’a in addition to their old enemies like Sheikhul Islam ibn Teymiyyah and Sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul-Wahhab.
So, I definitely believe that the rumor of “Ahbash-west connection” is not only a rumor. It’s one piece of the group’s involvement in multi million conspiracy projects. The target is not to demolish the group called “Wahhabiya” whom the west and “Ahbash” accused as “the proponents of Militant Islam”. But it is Islam itself.
Today, what makes us sad is not the enmity of the west. It is Ahbash’s being the only groups who call themselves “Muslim” but serve the western interests. Since the westerns singled out Islam as their “fierce enemy”, the Muslims of the world (both Sunni and Shi’a) have come close to each other to voice against the aggressors. But “Ahbash” is entering to all Muslim communities and making them to fight each other, then through, fulfilling the interest of the west. The Ahbashi’s dictation of the word “Wahhabiya… Wahabiyya…” has no other objective except serving the interest of the west and keeping their version of Islam in place. So what is the solution?
Allah knows the solution but be sure that He protects His religion and His Party (Muslims).
About these ads

አህባሽ ተነቃበት
በ አሜሪካ ና በ እስራኢል ሽብርተኝነት ለመዋጋት ሲባል የተመሰረተው ኣህባሽ ኑፋቄ ኣገራችን ገብቶ መበጥበጥ ከጀመረ ቆየ።ኢሃዲግ ህዝቡን ረግጦ ለመግዛት እንዲመቸው በሃይማኖት ጣልቃ በመግባት ጠንካራ ሙስሊሞችን ኣጥፍቶ እነዚህ(አህባሽ)ለማስተማር(ለማጥመቅ) ጀመረ።ከንቱ ሙከራ። ለሃይማኖት መቆርቆረ የማያውቁት(ጫት ከመቃም በስተቀር)መብታቸው እንኳን ማስከበር መቻል ቀርቶ ለመብታቸው የሚታገሉ ሙስሊሞችን የሚንቁ ናቸው።ማንም ኢስላምን በመጥፎ እንዲነካ ኣንፈቅድም።በሃገራችን ማግኘት ያለብን መብት ሁሉ እንተይቃለን።ማንም አሸባሪ ወዘተ ቢል ኣንሰማውም።በመብት ቀልድ የለም የአጼዎቹ በደል ይበቃናል።ኢትዮፕያ ዉስጥ ሙስሊሞች ኢስላማዊ ጋዜጣ የላቸው፣ኢስላማዊ ትምህርት ቤት የላቸው፣ኢስላማዊ ሬድዮ የላቸው፣ኢስላማዊ ብሎግ የላቸው።ይህ ሁሉ የመንግስታችን የእኩልነት ጩሀት የወለደው ብሶት ነው።

Africa TV - le islaam min abereketin?

Was Islam Spread by the Sword?

Description: Refutation of a common myth that states Islam was spread by the sword and that people were forced to become Muslims.
By AlJumuah Magazine
Published on 31 Dec 2007 - Last modified on 16 Oct 2011
Viewed: 28624 (daily average: 14) - Rating: 3.6 out of 5 - Rated by: 111
Printed: 818 - Emailed: 50 - Commented on: 2
Category: Articles > Current Issues > Jihad and Terrorism

It is a common misconception with some non-Muslims that Islam would not have millions of adherents all over the world, if it had not been spread by the use of force.

The following points will make it clear, that far from being spread by the sword, it was the inherent force of truth, reason and logic that was responsible for the rapid spread of Islam.

Islam has always given respect and freedom of religion to all faiths. Freedom of religion is ordained in the Quran itself:

“There shall be no compulsion in [acceptance of] the religion. The right course has become clear from the wrong.” (Quran 2:256)

The noted historian De Lacy O’Leary wrote:[1] “History makes it clear however, that the legend of fanatical Muslims sweeping through the world and forcing Islam at the point of the sword upon conquered races is one of the most fantastically absurd myths that historians have ever repeated.”

The famous historian, Thomas Carlyle, in his book Heroes and Hero worship, refers to this misconception about the spread of Islam: “The sword indeed, but where will you get your sword? Every new opinion, at its starting is precisely in a minority of one; in one man’s head alone. There it dwells as yet. One man alone of the whole world believes it, there is one man against all men. That he takes a sword and tries to propagate with that will do little for him. You must get your sword! On the whole, a thing will propagate itself as it can.”

If Islam was spread by the sword, it was the sword of intellect and convincing arguments. It is this sword that conquers the hearts and minds of people. The Quran says in this connection:

“Invite to the way of your Lord with wisdom and good instruction, and argue with them in a way that is best.” (Quran 16:125)

The facts speak for themselves

· Indonesia is the country that has the largest number of Muslims in the world, and the majority of people in Malaysia are Muslims. But, no Muslim army ever went to Indonesia or Malaysia. It is an established historical fact that Indonesia entered Islam not due to war, but because of its moral message. Despite the disappearance of Islamic government from many regions once ruled by it, their original inhabitants have remained Muslims. Moreover, they carried the message of truth, inviting others to it as well, and in so doing endured harm, affliction and oppression. The same can be said for those in the regions of Syria and Jordan, Egypt, Iraq, North Africa, Asia, the Balkans and in Spain. This shows that the effect of Islam on the population was one of moral conviction, in contrast to occupation by western colonialists, finally compelled to leave lands whose peoples held only memories of affliction, sorrow, subjugation and oppression.

· Muslims ruled Spain (Andalusia) for about 800 years. During this period the Christians and Jews enjoyed freedom to practice their respective religions, and this is a documented historical fact.

· Christian and Jewish minorities have survived in the Muslim lands of the Middle East for centuries. Countries such as Egypt, Morocco, Palestine, Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan all have significant Christian and Jewish populations.

· Muslims ruled India for about a thousand years, and therefore had the power to force each and every non-Muslim of India to convert to Islam, but they did not, and thus more than 80% of the Indian population remains non-Muslim.

· Similarly, Islam spread rapidly on the East Coast of Africa. And likewise no Muslim army was ever dispatched to the East Coast of Africa.

· An article in Reader’s Digest ‘Almanac’, yearbook 1986, gives the statistics of the increase of the percentage of the major religions of the world in half a century from 1934 to 1984. This article also appeared in The Plain Truth magazine. At the top was Islam, which increased by 235%, while Christianity had increased by 47%. During this fifty-year period, there was no “Islamic conquest” yet Islam spread at an extraordinary rate.

· Today the fastest growing religion in America and Europe is Islam. The Muslims in these lands are a minority. The only sword they have in their possession is the sword of truth. It is this sword that is converting thousands to Islam.

· Islamic law protects the privileged status of minorities, and that is why non-Muslim places of worship have flourished all over the Islamic world. Islamic law also allows non-Muslim minorities to set up their own courts, which implement family laws drawn up by the minorities themselves. The life and property of all citizens in an Islamic state are considered sacred whether they are Muslims or not.

Conclusion

It is clear, therefore, that Islam did not spread by the sword. The “sword of Islam” did not convert all the non-Muslim minorities in Muslim countries. In India, where Muslims ruled for 800 years, they are still a minority. In the U.S.A., Islam is the fastest growing religion and has over six million followers.

In his book The World’s Religions, Huston Smith discusses how the prophet Muhammad granted freedom of religion to the Jews and Christians under Muslim rule:

The Prophet had a document drawn up in which he stipulated that Jews and Christians “shall be protected from all insults and harm; they shall have an equal right with our own people to our assistance and good offices,” and further, “they shall practice their religion as freely as the Muslims.”[2]

Smith points out that Muslims regard that document as the first charter of freedom of conscience in human history and the authoritative model for those of every subsequent Muslim state.

Preliminary Issues

The Bible is the sacred scripture of Judaism and Christianity. The Christian Bible consists of the Old Testament and the New Testament, with the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox versions of the Old Testament being slightly larger because of their acceptance of certain books not accepted as scripture by Protestants. The Jewish Bible includes only the books known to Christians as the Old Testament. Furthermore, the arrangements of the Jewish and Christian canons differ considerably.[1] Prophet Muhammad has been prophesized in both the Old Testament and the New Testament.

Jesus and the Apostles are believed to have spoken Aramaic. Aramaic continued in wide use until about AD 650, when it was supplanted by Arabic.[2] The present day Bible is not, however, based on the Aramaic manuscripts, but on Greek and Latin versions.

Quoting the Bible prophecies does not entail that Muslims accept the present day Bible in its entirety as God’s revelation. For the Islamic belief on previous scriptures, please click here.

It is not a pre-condition of acceptance that a prophet be foretold by an earlier prophet. Moses was a prophet to Pharaoh even though he was not prophesized by anyone before him. Abraham was God’s prophet to Nimrod, yet no one prophesized his coming. Noah, Lot, and others were true prophets of God, yet they were not foretold. The evidence of a prophet’s truth is not limited to old prophecies, but it includes the actual message brought by him, miracles and more.

Discussing prophecies is a delicate matter. It requires sifting through Bible versions and translations, recently discovered manuscripts and searching out Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic words and investigating them. The task becomes especially difficult when: “prior to the printing press (15th century), all copies of Bibles show textual variations.”[3] This is not an easy subject for lay people. For this reason, the best testimony comes from ancient and modern experts in the area who acknowledged the prophecies.

We have records of early Jews and Christians, both monks and rabbis, who witnessed that Muhammad was the fulfillment of specific Bible prophecies. The following are some examples of these people.

The Awaited Prophet

Pre-Islam Jews and Christians of Arabia were awaiting a prophet. Before the appearance of Muhammad, Arabia was home to Jews, Christians, and pagan Arabs who, on occasion, went to war with each other. The Jews and Christians would say: “The time has come for the unlettered prophet to appear who will revive the religion of Abraham. We will join his ranks and wage fierce war against you.” When Muhammad actually appeared, some of them believed in him, and some refused. This is why God revealed:

“And when there came to them a Book [Quran] from God confirming that which was with them – although before they used to pray for victory against those who disbelieved – but [then] when there came to them that which they recognized, they disbelieved in it; so the curse of God will be upon the disbelievers.” (Quran 2:89)

The first witness was Buhaira, the Christian monk, who recognized Muhammad’s prophethood when he was still young and told his uncle:

“…a great fortune lies before your nephew, so take him home quickly.”[4]

The second witness was Waraqah bin Nawfal, a Christian scholar who died soon after a solitary meeting with Muhammad. Waraqah attested Muhammad was the Prophet of his time and received revelation exactly like Moses and Jesus.[5]

The Jews of Medina were anxiously awaiting the arrival of a prophet. The third and fourth witnesses were their two famous Jewish rabbis, Abdullah bin Salam and Mukhayriq.[6]

The sixth and seventh witnesses were also Yemeni Jewish rabbis, Wahb ibn Munabbih, and Ka’b al-Ahbar (d. 656 CE). Ka’b found long passages of praise and the description of the Prophet prophesized by Moses in the Bible.[7]

The Quran states:

“Is it not a sign to them that the learned men of the Children of Israel knew it (as true)?” (Quran 26:197)

Islam defines a miracle as an extraordinary act or event that is contrary to the laws of nature and can only come about through the direct intervention of God Almighty Himself. The Arabic word for miracle is mu’jizah. It stems from the word ajz, meaning something that incapacitates, cannot be resisted, unique. According to Islam, miracles are performed by the permission of God, by the Prophets of God. Miracles are not magic, which is by definition a trick or illusion, nor is a miracle an event brought about by a learned righteous people who are not Prophets of God. These events are called karamahs. Thus we find three distinct categories, miracles, karamahs and magic.

God sent the Prophets and Messengers primarily to guide humankind. They were humans, of outstanding character, pious and trustworthy, that the people could emulate and look to for direction. They were not gods, demi-gods or saints with divine qualities, rather they were mere mortals charged with a difficult task. They possessed exceptional characteristics because they were obligated to face extraordinary trials and tribulations in order to spread the message to worship God Alone.

“And I (God) created not the jinn[1] and mankind except that they should worship Me (Alone)”. (Quran 51:56)

In order to make each Prophet credible in his particular time and place, God granted them miracles, pertinent, relevant and understandable to the people to whom they were sent. In the time of Moses magic and sorcery were prevalent therefore Moses’ miracles appealed to the people he was sent to guide. In the time of Muhammad, the Arabs, although predominantly unlettered, were masters of the spoken word. Their poetry and prose were considered outstanding and a model of literary excellence and the miracle of Prophet Muhammad, may God praise him, was of this nature and much more..The miracle that defined Prophet Solomon was his unique kingdom. At the time of Jesus, the Israelites were very knowledgeable in the field of medicine. Consequently, the miracles Jesus performed were of this nature and included returning sight to the blind, healing lepers and raising the dead.

“And you heal those born blind and the lepers by My leave. And behold! You bring forth the dead by My leave.” (Quran 5:10)

A karamah is an extraordinary matter or event that is brought about at the hands of a believer who obeys God, refrains from sin and whose piety at a very high level in the sight of God. Unlike a miracle which is meant to be done publically so that people would recognize the truthfulness of the Prophet, a karamah usually only benefits the one to whom it is given. A karamah could include such things as knowledge, power or something astonishing such as the karamah that was given to Usayd ibn al-Hudayr, one of Prophet Muhammad’s companions. A group of angels in a cloud of light shaded Usayd when he recited Quran[2]. A karamah also occurred for Maryam, the mother of Prophet Jesus.

So her Lord accepted her with goodly acceptance. He made her grow in a good manner and put her under the care of Zakariya . Every time he entered her praying place, he found her supplied with sustenance. He said: “O Maryam (Mary)! From where have you got this?” She said, “This is from God. Verily, God provides sustenance to whom He wills, without limit.” (Quran 3:37)

A miracle results in nothing but good and is given by the Almighty to the Prophets as a sign of their veracity. This is coupled with a life of exemplary morals and character, and a message of goodness.

Magic can also bring about something extraordinary; however no good can come from magic. It is performed by evil people and is done by seeking the help of the devils and drawing close to them[3]. Miracles cannot be learnt or undone, whereas magic can be learnt, cancelled out or undone.

Prophet Moses’ encounter with the magicians at Pharaoh’s court explains the difference between magic and miracles.

They said: “O Musa (Moses)! Either you throw (first), or shall we have the (first) throw?” He (Moses) said: “Throw you (first).” When they threw they bewitched the eyes of the people, and struck terror into them, and they displayed a great magic. And We revealed to Moses, “Throw your stick,” and behold! It swallowed up straight away all the falsehoods which they showed. Thus truth was confirmed, and all that they did was made of no effect. So they were defeated there and returned disgraced. And the magicians fell down prostrate. (Quran 7:115-120)

The magicians understood that Moses was not preforming a trick or illusion as they had done. They understood deception well and knew that Moses’ actions were a miracle. Thus they accepted the truth and fell down in prostration to God, knowing full well that it would bring about their death for disobeying Pharaoh.

Miracles can be of two types; those that occur at the request of the people, who want a sign of the veracity of the Prophet who was sent to them and the second type, occur without being requested. An example of the first type is when Prophet Saleh’s people requested he bring out from behind the mountain a she camel and her offspring. As well, when the unbelievers in Mecca asked the Prophet Muhammad to show them a miracle, he showed them the splitting of the moon. One of Prophet Muhammad’s companions mentioned this event saying, “We were with God’s Messenger at Mina, when the moon was split in two parts. One part was behind the mountain and the other one was on this side of the mountain. God’s Messenger said to us, “Bear witness to this”[4].

An example of the second type is what happened when the tree trunk cried and longed for Prophet Muhammad. He, the Prophet used to give his Friday speech while leaning on a palm tree. One of his followers suggested they make a pulpit for him and they did. So the next Friday when the Prophet stood on the pulpit, the tree trunk began whimpering for him like a child.

Muslims believe that the Quran itself is a miracle. Prophet Muhammad said, “Every Prophet was given miracles on account of which their people believed; but, I have been given divine revelation which Allah has revealed to me, so I hope that my followers will outnumber the followers of other Prophets on Resurrection Day.”[5] Prophet Muhammad was implying that the Quran itself is the greatest miracle of all time; it is a miraculous book filled with miracles of all kinds. Its revelation, literary excellence, and its content, including scientific, prophetic and historical information, all contribute to Quran’s status as a miracle.

በትናንትና አለት ባለሁበት ካምፓስ በሙስሊም ተማሪዎች የተዘጋጀ የሰደቃ ፕሮግራም ነበር።በጣም ደስ ይል ነበር።የወስያ ፕሮግራምም ነበር።ወላ በፍቅር ነው ያሳለፍነው።ኣንድነታችን ኣጠናክረን የሚፋቀር ሙስሊም ማፍራት እንድቻል የበኩላችን ለማበርከት ነው።አንድ ኣላህ።ኣንድ እምነት።ይዘን እንዘልቃለን።ለመብታችን ደግሞ በጋራ እንቆማለን።

Friday, 14 June 2013

እንዴት ልንገራቸው?

የዑማው አስትንፋስ በዳአዋ የደረሰ፣
የሙናፍቅ ቀልቡ በዳአዋው የራሰ ፣
አንዴት ነው ነገሩ ሰውን የመፈረጅ
እያብጠለጠሉ ማስነገር አንደአዋጅ።
የአላህ ቁዋውን ባታውቁት ነው እንጅ።
የኛ ኡስታዞችማ ያበራሉ እንደኮከብ፣
በሀበሻ ምድር ተውህድን ሲታሰብ ።
እነኛ ያመኑት ሽርክን ተገን አርገው፣
ቢደአ ሊያንግሱ ሌትተቀን ተግተው፣
ተመለሱ ባዶ አንገታቸው ደፍተው።
ብትነቁ በተሻለ ሰው ማክፈር ትታቹ፣
አንዴት ተረሳቹ ሟች መሆናቹ፣
ስሙ እንጂ አናንተ ተውሂድ የማታውቁ፣
ወይ አስተንትናቹ በቁርዓን አትነቁ ።
አቡኪ አቡኪ የኛ አምራችን፣
ሁሌም ትኖራለህ በንፁህ ልባችን።

ሰኔ 8/2005 ዓል ኢምራን የህያ

ጀግና የ አህባሽ ጠላት የ እስላም የ ቁርጥ ቀን ልጅ ዶ/ር ዛክር ናይክ

Thursday, 13 June 2013

ወይ አለማወቅ ከንቱ

የኛው ጉድ የሆነው አህባሽ የተባለው 

ከትምህርቶቹ በጣም የሚገርመው 

ከጠላት አብልጦ ሙስሊም መጥላቱ ነው። 

ጎዶሎ አቂዳቸው አልቀበል ያለ፣ 

በሼሃቸው ምክር ካፍር አየተባለ፣ 

አለ በየቦታው ሙስሊም የተባለ።

ቁርአን ማስተንተን ካቃታቸው ተፍስሩ 

ለምን አልሞችን መጠየቅን ፈሩ 

ቁርአን ለመካድ አንዴትስ ደፈሩ ።

ሽርክና ቢዳአ ሞልቶ በሀገሩ 

ተውህድን ለማንገስ ወንድሞች ቢጥሩ 

ካፍር አያሉአቸው አነርሱው ከፈሩ።

ሰው አላህ ትቶ ሼህ ሲያመልክ 

እወዳለሁ ብሎ እያለፈ ልክ ።

የቱ ነው ተውሂዱ ያስተማርነው ታድያ 

ካፍር አለመሆን ምንድነው መለያ።

ወላሂ አህባሽን እናጥፋ ከሀገር 

ጊዜ አንስጣቸው እንዳያልፉ ድንበር።

ከ እስላም ጠላቶች አብረው ሊያጠፉን 

እስላምን አጥፍተው ከተውሂድ ሊገፉን ።

አልላህ ይዘንላቸው 

መንገዱን ይምራቸው 

አምቢ ካሉ ደግሞ ከራህመቱ ያርቃቸው። 

አላህ ይጠብቀን በዛት በሲፋቱ ፣

አንዲህም ይኖራል አለማወቅ ከንቱ።      

ሰኔ 8/2005 ዓል ኢምራን የህያ ።።

Tuesday, 11 June 2013

(Must Watch) ኢቲቪ በስህተት ያሳየው የመርማሪዎች ጉድ ተጋለጠ

Monday, 10 June 2013

ኡማው ጠንካራ ነው
በዑማው ላይ የመጣች
   አንዲት ነቀዝ ተፈጥራ፣
ሕዝቡን ልታፋጀው
   በአይሁድ ተቀጥራ፣
ያ ሙአሚን ሕዝብ
   በኩፋር ልትመራ።
ነቀዝዋ ቸኩላ ገባች
               ከሙስሊም ዘንዳ ፣
ጉድ ልታበስር
   ያውም በአቂዳ።
የነብዩ(ሰዓወ) መልአክት
   በቅቶን ሳንፈፅመው፣
አንዱ ሼህ ተነስቶ
   መርቡን ሊንደው።
የሙአሚኖች ጩሀት ቀለጠ ተስፋፋ፣
ይህን የአቂዳ ፀር ከአገር ሊያጠፋ።
በገዛ ዲናችን ገብተው ሊዞልሙን፣
የክህደት ልፈፋ ቀረርቶ ሊያሰሙን።
የኛ መሪያችን ነብዩ ሙሐመድ ፣
ሰላትና ሰላም በአርሳቸው ይውረድ።
አንዴ ብርሃን ናቸው ለሁሉም የበቁ፣
አላህ ያላቃቸው ሽርክን የናቁ
ያስጠነቀቁ ።
የአንድነት ገመድ በተውሂድ ጠንክሮ ፣
ይኖራል አንጂ ከኩፋር ተቃቅሮ ።
የጠራ አቂዳችን የአላህ ዋህደንያ ፣
የፍቅራችን ምልክት ሆኖን መለያ።
ታሪክ አገላብጠህ ብትመረምር አውቀት ፣
እስላም ሰላም አንጂ አንዳልሆነ ጥፋት።
ጥፋትማ ተገባ ለነዝያ ለካዱ፣
ኩራት በልባቸው ይዘው ለሚሄዱ ።

                                         ኢምራን ሃሩን።።
   ሰኔ 3/2005 ዓል

አብሽሩ
አናንተ ሙስሊሞች ፍቅር የሆናችሁ ፣
በነብዩ (ሰአወ) መሃባ ለተሳሰራችሁ ፣
አንደምን ናችሁ።
ሁሉንም ስናውቀው አንደ ተጎዳን ፣
ሰብር አስቀድመን አዚህ ደረስን።
አላህ ልፈትነን ይሆናል ያመጣው፣

Monday, 3 June 2013

ያንብቡ ታላቅ አውቀት ይሽምቱ

ማንም ሊያነበው የሚገባ ፣ቢያነበው የሚጠቅመው፣
በዓለም አሉ ከሚባሉ ጥቂት ታላላቅ ደራስያን መሃል አንዱ የሆነው አድናን ኦክታር (ሃሩን የህያ )ነው።ማንኛውም አውቀት ሊሰጦት ይችላል።ፖለትጫ፣ሃይማኖት ፣ስነ ፈለክ ፣ሳይንስ ፣ሌሎችም።

Friday, 31 May 2013

የአላህ ወዳጆች አነማን ናቸው?
መልስ፣ የ አላህ ወዳጆች ጥንቁቆችና መልካም መሪዎች ናቸው።አላህ በአጅጉ የሚፈሩና ከኃጢአት የራቁና ከወንጀል የተጠበቁ፣መልካም ስራዎችን ለሚፈፅም የሚጥሩ ፣ቁርአን ና ሱናን አጥብቀው የያዙ የ አላህ ባሮች ናቸው።

islam and thier beauty

ሁላችንም ለዲናችን የተቻለንን ማበርከት አለብን።ኢስላም የመሰለ ዲን ተገኝቶ ነው።ሱብሃነሏህ እንጠቀምበት ።

Thursday, 23 May 2013

quran in amharic

harun yehya

the project of deliverance allah shows to people is the system of the mahdi.it is the system of the jesus messiah,it is the formation of the unity of islam